Legal Opinion

Amerifirst Savings Bank of Xenia v. Krug

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1999No. C.A. Case Nos. 17345 and 17349. T.C. Case No. 95-4508PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick N. Young, Judge.

In this case, defendants-appellants Jerry Krug, d.b.a. Krug Auto Sales (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Jerry Krug”), Tim Krug, and Theran Alexander appeal from the trial court’s judgment entry affirming the jury verdicts and damage awards against them and in favor of Amerifirst Bank of Xenia, Ohio (“Amerifirst”). Each appellant asserts their own respective assignments of error.

The original complaint in this matter was filed on December 21, 1995, by Amerifirst against all three appellants, Jerry Krug, Timothy Krug, and Alexander, with an amended complaint…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Garg v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. ChristianOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Di v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Mobley v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Sullinger v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API