Joseph Lombardo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DeGUILIO, District Judge.
Joseph Lombardo is serving a life sentence on his convictions for racketeering, murder, and obstruction of justice. After *550we affirmed his convictions and sentence on direct appeal, he retained a new attorney to argue that his convictions were the product of his trial counsel’s ineffectiveness. However, his new attorney misunderstood when the one-year limitations period for motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 began running, and thus filed Lombardo’s motion too late.
The question in this appeal is whether an attorney’s miscalculation of a statute of limitations justifies…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Brian Lax v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Douglas Hicks v. Randall HeppCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- DeWayne Perry v. Richard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Bill Conroy v. Scott ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Sparre v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.