Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Drainage Dist. No. 2

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1947No. 7374PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages for injuries to crops growing on his lands situate along Fry Creek, alleging in substance that respondents wrongfully, negligently, and contrary to plans adopted by the District for dikes and drains, which included accelerating the flow of said Creek without other interference therewith, built and maintained a dam in, and thereby obstructed the channel of, said Creek, causing the waters thereof during the run-off season to seep into and overflow said lands and destroy said crops.

Respondents demurred to the complaint upon both…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Henderson v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Posey v. DoveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Worlton v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Milbert v. Carl Carbon, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API