Legal Opinion

Worlton v. Davis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1952No. 7896PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

This is an action brought by appellants, seeking to restrain respondent from engaging in the practice of medicine and surgery within the County of Bonneville, Idaho, for the period of five years from and after the 8th day of June, 1951. Among other allegations in their complaint, are the following:

“I.
“That on and prior to the 15th day of July, 1949, the Idaho Falls Clinic was a co-partnership consisting of W. R. Abbott, Clyde C. Hulse, and the plaintiffs herein, all of said co-partners being duly license- and practicing physicians and surgeons in the State of Idaho except said…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re Contempt Proceedings of Eastern Idaho Loan & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Quiring v. QuiringIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Whitney v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API