Legal Opinion

Meraz v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2001No. B141637PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff Leopoldo Meraz appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange after the trial court determined that the bodily injury suffered by plaintiff was not covered under the insured’s homeowners policy. We conclude that the policy provided coverage, and reverse.

Facts

In or before 1996, Armando Aviles bought a 1974 Ford Cargo van. The van was not in operating condition at the time Aviles acquired it. It was delivered to the residence of his next-door neighbor, Pedro Avella, on a flatbed truck, with an empty gas tank, no battery, no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clement v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Rosen v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Clement v. J & E ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. EMMI INC. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Mattel, Inc. v. XL Insurance America, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API