Legal Opinion
State v. Findlay
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 14, 1986No. 11158PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant, Marguerite Findlay, was charged in a substitute information, with the crime of robbery in the first degree by aiding, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-134 (a) (4) and 53E-8.1 She was convicted after a jury trial and sentenced to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a term of seven years. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction.2
The defendant raises five issues on appeal: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) whether the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to sup*330press…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.