Legal Opinion

Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2004No. CV-02-0439-PRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 In holding that a judgment stipulated to pursuant to a Morris agreement was reasonable, the superior court in this case relied on the fact that the insureds could have lost their real estate licenses as a consequence of an adverse result in the underlying action. We granted review to decide whether such potential consequences to an insured should be considered in determining the reasonableness of a Morris settlement.

I

¶2 This case arises out of a real estate transaction. Gary Tenney brokered the deal, under which Parking Concepts, Inc. (“PCI”) would acquire an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Royal Crane, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API