Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 In holding that a judgment stipulated to pursuant to a Morris agreement was reasonable, the superior court in this case relied on the fact that the insureds could have lost their real estate licenses as a consequence of an adverse result in the underlying action. We granted review to decide whether such potential consequences to an insured should be considered in determining the reasonableness of a Morris settlement.
I
¶2 This case arises out of a real estate transaction. Gary Tenney brokered the deal, under which Parking Concepts, Inc. (“PCI”) would acquire an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Royal Crane, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.