Legal Opinion

Tataranowicz v. Sullivan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 21, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

On April 20, 1990, plaintiffs filed this class action for declaratory and permanent injunctive relief, challenging the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ (the “Secretary”) eon-struction of the transition provisions of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Repeal Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-234, § 101(b), 103 Stat. 1979 (1989) (the “Repeal Act”). Plaintiffs contend that the Secretary erroneously construed the transition -provisions of the Repeal Act so as to unlawfully deny plaintiffs 100 days of Medicare coverage for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Lazaridis v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Hall v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Mary Tataranowicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Mary Tataranowicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API