Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mary Tataranowicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 1, 1992No. 91-5052Published

1DissentBuckley, Circuit Judge

It is axiomatic that in interpreting a statute, a court must begin with its language. It should also be clear by now that when that language answers the question before the court, there is no need to go further: “[W]here ... the statute’s language is plain, ‘the sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms.’ ” United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 1030, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989) (quoting Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 485, 37 S.Ct. 192, 194, 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917)). The question here is whether section 101(b)(1)(C) of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API