Dvorak v. Latimer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
This is an action brought to obtain a rescission of a contract for the sale of real property and for alternative relief in damages, in the event a return of plaintiff’s property cannot be had.
From the facts it appears that for more than two years prior to February 20, 1923, defendants (husband and wife) were the owners of certain ranch property situated in the county of Tulare. The said ranch was improved by a dwelling-house, barn, pumping plant, and some orange and peach trees. For some time prior to said date, plaintiff was the owner of a lot in the city of Pasadena, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hunter v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Tracy v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Owen v. Pomona Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Hill v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Themins v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Jennison v. Providence St. Vincent Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Forshagen v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Busey v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935