Hill v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from orders denying a new trial, in two actions consolidated and'tried together in the Superior Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The case ot Hill v. Wilson and wife was brought to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants for a balance of purchase-money alleged to be due for the real estate described therein, sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. To this complaint the defendants pleaded that the plaintiff had induced them to purchase the land and execute the mortgage by certain false and fraudulent representations.
The action of Wilson and wife against Hill was one to rescind the sale of the land by Hill to them, and cancel the mortgage on the same grounds set up in their an*95swer as a defense to the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Nudd v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Davis v. John Breuner Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Forshagen v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.