Legal Opinion
Wilmoth v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1995No. WD 50010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ULRICH, Presiding Judge.
The Director of Revenue appeals the reinstatement of Amy Jo Wilmoth’s driver’s license. Ms. Wilmoth’s license had been re voked under section 577.041, RSMol994 1 , for failure to submit to a chemical test as required by the Implied Consent Law. § 577.020. The order reinstating Ms. Wil-moth’s driver’s license is reversed, and the revocation is reinstituted.
To uphold a driver’s license revocation for failure to submit to chemical testing, the trial court must affirmatively find that (1) the driver was arrested, (2) the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Wall v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. IkermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McMaster v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brown v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Zimmerman v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Staggs v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.