State v. Ikerman
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SIMON, Presiding Judge.
The trial court granted defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence of test results based on a blood sample taken from defendant. The state appeals pursuant to § 547.200 RSMo Supp.1984. (All further references shall be to RSMo Supp.1984 un less otherwise indicated.) The state disputes the trial court finding that the blood sample had been taken from defendant in violation of § 577.041 because defendant refused his consent to the blood test and in violation of defendant’s Miranda rights because the police ignored defendant’s request to speak with his counsel. Our…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- United States v. Jack RoseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- State v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. ReichertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Costley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
- State v. FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. SetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.