Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1999No. 74429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.

Petitioner, Randy Zimmerman, appeals from the trial court’s judgment sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Section 577.041 RSMo (1994). Petitioner contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the revocation of his license because respondent, the Director of Revenue (the director), failed to meet her burden of proof that petitioner’s refusal of the chemical test was voluntary, intentional and informed because the only trial testimony was that the police officer read petitioner the Missouri Implied Consent Law from a form, but the state…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Teson v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. McMaster v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Wall v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rain v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Pendergrass v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Johnson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Jones v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Orr v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API