State v. Foster
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRISON, Presiding Judge.
The trial court sustained a “Motion In Limine” filed by Harry Don Foster (“Defendant”) in which he sought to prevent the State from introducing evidence of his alleged refusal to take a chemical breath test (“breath test”) at trial on the charge of DWI. The State appeals that decision, claiming the right to do so pursuant to § 547.200.1(2) 1 , which permits it to appeal from “any order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in ... [suppressing evidence ...”
Initially, we respond to Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal, in which he argues that the motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Weber v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Albrecht v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wilmoth v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. EisenhouerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- White v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. PuckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Moody v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Allison v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.