Legal Opinion

Schoon v. Smith

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 12, 2008No. 554, 2006PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

Appellant Richard W. Schoon is a director, but not a stockholder, of Troy Corporation, a privately held Delaware corporation. He filed a derivative action in the Court of Chancery on behalf of Troy, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by his fellow directors. Schoon argued below that his role as a fiduciary to the corporation should permit him to have the same standing a stockholder has to bring a derivative action. The Court of Chancery dismissed his complaint.

Schoon argues on appeal that this Court should hold that a director has the right to bring a derivative action for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  5. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brightstar Asia, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. EnglardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  5. CML V, LLC v. BaxSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API