Legal Opinion

Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. Englard

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 15, 2010No. C.A. 4476-VCLPublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LASTER, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff Hamilton Partners, L.P. owns approximately 4% of the common stock of nominal defendant New York Health Care, Inc. (“NYHC”), a de-listed New York corporation. Nominal defendant The Bio Balance Corp. (“Bio Balance”), a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of NYHC. Three of the individual defendants — Murry Englard, Howard Berg and Yoram Hacohen (the “Director Defendants”) — serve as directors of both NYHC and Bio Balance. The second amended complaint (the “Complaint”) asserts a derivative claim on behalf of NYHC and a double derivative…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Amalgamated Bank v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  3. In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. Martinez v. E.i. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API