Legal Opinion

Matter of Gregory

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1911No. 17, OriginalPublishedCited by 109 opinions

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The facts, which involve the constitutionality and construction of §§ 1176, 1177 of the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia prohibiting and punishing gift-enterprises, and the validity of a conviction thereunder, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The facts, which involve the constitutionality and construction of §§ 1176, 1177 of the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia prohibiting and punishing gift-enterprises, and the validity of a conviction thereunder, are stated in the opinion. Section 1177 of the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia does not define gift-enterprises. ■Such definition is found in the laws of the District of Columbia, 1871-73, Part II, 96, and see Re Lansburgh, 11 App. D. C. 512, and opinion in District v. Kraft, referred to in petition in this…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. By information filed in the Police Court of the District of Columbia, the petitioner was-charged with engaging “in the business of a gift-enterprise” in violation of § 1177 of the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia. Thereupon an agreed statement of facts was filed, by which it appeared that the petitioner, as the managing officer of The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, was conducting, within the District, its business of issuing and redeeming so-called “trading stamps” in the particular manner set forth. It was stipulated that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  5. In Re CoySupreme Court of the United States · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API