Burkhart v. Barger
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
■Opinion op the Court by
Creal, Commissioner—
Affirming.
In January 1933, E. S. Barger and Roy Burkhart entered into a written contract to furnish growers Sericea lespedeza seed to be planted by the growers and for which Barger and Burkhart were to receive a one-half interest in all seed grown. It was recited in substance in the contract that the seed was grown by Roy Burk-hart which he was to furnish at the rate of $4 per pound; that Barger had paid him $1,500 for 375 pounds and further agreed to pay $4 per pound for such additional amount as they might place with, growers, not to exceed 375…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Proctor v. RayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Breslin v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Kohler v. BernheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Snyder v. Howard's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- R. B. Tyler Co. v. CurdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mafizola v. Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947