Schmidt v. Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as “superintendent” of its 12 story building at 229 West 36th Street in New York City. A substantial part of this building was occupied by tenants engaged in the production of goods for interstate commerce, and it is conceded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover $751.68, with interest, as overtime wages and liquidated damages, unless he is exempted from the coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act by section 13 thereof, which declares that the wages and hours requirements shall not apply to “any employee employed in a bona…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Helliwell v. HabermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Fanelli v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Smith v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walling v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Barrett v. National Malleable & Steel Castings Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Koljenovic v. MarxDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Marshall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Grant v. Bergdorf & Goodman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.