Legal Opinion

Iowa Washing Mach. Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 18, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Iowa Washing Machine Company against Montgomery Ward & Co. for infringement of reissue letters patent No. 12,733, for a washing machine, granted to Bert A. Stocking and Hiram Mendenhall. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

There is a touch of business romance in this suit concerning a washing machine, and an illustration of the opportunities always open to ingenious men to make contributions to the general good and to gather in a just reward for their efforts. These patentees were men of limited attainments, who appreciated the desirability of producing, if possible, a washing machine arrangement which would be a substantial saver of labor, would be fairly simple in construction, and exceedingly simple in operation.

The prior art had developed a large variety of machines, which were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Autopiano Co. v. American Player Action Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wm. F. Goessling Box Co. v. GumbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  2. Armstrong v. Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Audiffren Refrigerating Mach. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  4. Block v. Arrowsmith Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  5. Domestic Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API