Legal Opinion

Block v. Arrowsmith Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Alexander E. Block and another against the Arrowsinith Manufacturing Company. On motion to restrain plaintiffs from taking depositions without order of court after expiration of time for doing so under equity rules.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS. District Judge.

The bill in the above-stated cause was filed April 12, 1916. and the answer was filed and the cause was at issue on July 20, 1916. The ca.se appeared on the equity trial calendar of this court for the November term. 1916, and the January term, 1917. The equity list has not been called since. On January 24, 1917, solicitor for plaintiffs sent notice, as I understand it, by mail from St. Eouis to the solicitor of defendant, whose office is in New York City, of the taking of depositions of 15 witnesses at St. Eouis, Mo., on February 19, 1917. This notice was received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iowa Washing Mach. Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Audiffren Refrigerating Mach. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
  2. Juster v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Meyers v. Occidental Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API