United States v. Bergland
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
The defendants in this action are charged in a three-count indictment with violations of Sections 2, 371, 1084, and 1952 of Title 18 U.S.C.A.
Briefly, the first count charges that the defendants conspired and agreed upon a scheme whereby they would use a telephone in interstate commerce to promote a gambling enterprise which involved the placing of bets on horse races.
Section 1084, Title 18 U.S.C.A., provides in pertinent part as follows:
“(a) Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BaborianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1981
- United States v. AlpirnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969