Legal Opinion

United States v. Bergland

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 31, 1962No. 62-CR-118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The defendants in this action are charged in a three-count indictment with violations of Sections 2, 371, 1084, and 1952 of Title 18 U.S.C.A.

Briefly, the first count charges that the defendants conspired and agreed upon a scheme whereby they would use a telephone in interstate commerce to promote a gambling enterprise which involved the placing of bets on horse races.

Section 1084, Title 18 U.S.C.A., provides in pertinent part as follows:

“(a) Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BaborianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1981
  2. United States v. AlpirnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API