Legal Opinion

Roush v. Layton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Action by the appell.ee Layton against Mary E. Long, Andrew J. Roush, the/ appellant, and Erasmus M. Weaver.

It is alleged in the complaint, that “ on the 24th day of June, 1869, in the common pleas of said county, Mary E. Long, by her next friend, Thomas Earl, recovered a judgment against the appellee Layton for five hundred dollars, for an alleged seduction of said Mary E. Long; that said Roush entered a lien thereon, as the attorney of said Mary E. Long, for two hundred and fifty dollars, for his fee, and after-wards assigned two hundred and forty dollars of the amount to said Weaver.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webster v. MaidenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Cox v. HutchingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Pattison v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Statelar's Administrator v. Sample's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hiatt v. BallingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Cartwright v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Houston v. BrunerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State ex rel. Turner v. Circuit Court for Ozaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API