Legal Opinion

Cox v. Hutchings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit -Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Complaint for a new trial. Two grounds are assigned :

1. Surprise at the testimony of the plaintiff, Hutchings.

2. Newly discovered evidence.

The case in which the new trial is asked was this:

*220Hutchings sued Cox for 481 dollars, which he alleged the latter owed him for money and services expended and performed by the former, (Hutchings,) in purchasing hogs for the latter, (Cox.)

Cox answered, the general denial, and a special denial, that Hutchings purchased the hogs in question for himself, not for Cox, the defendant.

The cause was tried after the act making parties competent witnesses came into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. PeeplesIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. McKee v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Elliott v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. McDaniel v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Lowry v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Atkisson v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API