Legal Opinion

People v. Lourido

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1987PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

A detective may not be permitted to testify that a person being investigated and queried about the commission of a crime, who was not shown to understand English, responded with a high shrug of the shoulders. Comment by the prosecutor in summation compounded the prejudicial inferences of guilt which the jury was allowed to draw from this gesture. Further, in a rape case where the accused and the *431victim knew one another and consent was in issue, it is reversible error to instruct the jury on both an original and an amended version of a statute prescribing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Greenfield v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. AgostoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. De GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API