People v. Lourido
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
A detective may not be permitted to testify that a person being investigated and queried about the commission of a crime, who was not shown to understand English, responded with a high shrug of the shoulders. Comment by the prosecutor in summation compounded the prejudicial inferences of guilt which the jury was allowed to draw from this gesture. Further, in a rape case where the accused and the *431victim knew one another and consent was in issue, it is reversible error to instruct the jury on both an original and an amended version of a statute prescribing the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Greenfield v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- The People v. Terrance L. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. AgostoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. De GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.