People v. Agosto
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On appeal defendant’s chief contention is that the trial court’s failure to respond to a jury note or to notify counsel of its existence constituted error requiring reversal. We agree with the Appellate Division that it did not.
During the first two days of deliberation, the jury sent out several notes which asked for exhibits, readbacks, or additional instructions. All but one of the notes which required the jury to be returned to the courtroom took 30 or more minutes to answer. At 6:50 p.m. on the second…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LouridoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. OchsNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. CrumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by105 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. HuertasNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. InnissNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- The People v. Pamela Hanson, The People v. Julian SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.