The People v. Terrance L. Mack
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fahey, J.
Criminal Procedure Law § 310.30 imposes two responsibilities on trial courts upon receipt of a substantive note from a deliberating jury: the court must provide counsel with meaningful notice of the content of the note, and the court must provide a meaningful response to the jury (People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 276-277 [1991]). A trial court’s failure to fulfill its first responsibility — meaningful notice to counsel — falls within the narrow class of mode of proceedings errors for which preservation is not required (see id. at 279). On this appeal, we consider *537whet…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- The People v. Joseph Conceicao / The People v. Federico Perez / The People v. Javier SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- The People v. Shane MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.