Legal Opinion

The People v. Terrance L. Mack

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2016No. 74PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fahey, J.

Criminal Procedure Law § 310.30 imposes two responsibilities on trial courts upon receipt of a substantive note from a deliberating jury: the court must provide counsel with meaningful notice of the content of the note, and the court must provide a meaningful response to the jury (People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 276-277 [1991]). A trial court’s failure to fulfill its first responsibility — meaningful notice to counsel — falls within the narrow class of mode of proceedings errors for which preservation is not required (see id. at 279). On this appeal, we consider *537whet…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. The People v. Joseph Conceicao / The People v. Federico Perez / The People v. Javier SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. The People v. Shane MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API