National Land & Coal Co. v. Zugar
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. The court did not err in permitting counsel for the defendant to cross-examine his own client after he had been- called to the stand by counsel for the plaintiff, although plaintiff’s counsel stated that he called him as a witness against himself in order to prove only one point necessary to making out a prima facie case. Though the rule in a large number of States' is to the contrary, this court has held that the provisions of the Code entitling one to make a thorough and sifting examination of a witness on cross-examination applies in such cases; and in the present case it was not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Tuells v. TorrasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Cowart v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Blalock v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Leverett v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fields v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Whipkey v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Rainey v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.