Blalock v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
Certiorari. Before Judge Bartlett. Houston superior court. April term, 1894. Suit was brought in a magistrate’s court against Smith and Blasingame, upon a promissory note for $75 with interest, etc. There was a judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs took the cause by certiorari to the superior court. The certiorari was dismissed upon the ground that the errors complained of were not errors of law, but mixed questions of law and fact.
Read the full summary
Certiorari. Before Judge Bartlett. Houston superior court. April term, 1894. Suit was brought in a magistrate’s court against Smith and Blasingame, upon a promissory note for $75 with interest, etc. There was a judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs took the cause by certiorari to the superior court. The certiorari was dismissed upon the ground that the errors complained of were not errors of law, but mixed questions of law and fact. The note sued on was dated September 5, 1890, due sixty days after date, payable to plaintiffs or bearer, and contained a mortgage upon a printing-press and outfit,…
1Opinion of the Court
*557 Judgment reversed.
"W. H. Harris and A. S. Giles, for plaintiffs. L. L. Brown and R. D. Smith, for defendants.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Richards v. HarpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Benefield v. BenefieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- National Land & Coal Co. v. ZugarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.