Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 26, 1989No. 3-88 CIV 666PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
This action comes before the court on the motions of Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis (“Memorial”) and the American National Red Cross (“Red Cross”) for summary judgment. Both defendants claim that this action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Additionally, Memorial requests summary judgment on the grounds that it was not negligent because it complied with all regulations and standards of the blood banking industry in effect in 1984. For the reasons stated below, summary judgment will be granted to both defendants on the basis of the statute of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sherrial T. St. Amant v. Ronald J. Benoit and John H. Robichaux, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Patty C. Kaiser and James Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Incorporated and American Red Cross, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- John Doe and Jane Doe v. American National Red Cross, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Patty C. Kaiser James Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Incorporated American Red Cross, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Doe v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.