Legal Opinion
Doe v. American National Red Cross
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 18, 1992No. 91-C-897-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this civil action against defendant on October 19, 1991, alleging, inter alia, that John Doe contracted the HIV virus as a result of defendant’s negligence in screening blood donors and testing blood for use in transfusions. Presently before the court are cross motions for summary judgment on the issue whether plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations. In the event the issue is decided in plaintiffs’ favor, defendant wants the court to determine that its actions are governed by a professional standard of care, rather…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Indiana Grocery, Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. American National Red CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Doe v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- John Doe and Jane Doe v. American National Red Cross, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Doe v. Cutter BiologicalDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Jane Doe, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John Doe v. American National Red Cross, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.