Legal Opinion
Loder v. Jayne
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 1906No. 65PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law. On motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
The plaintiff, C. G. A. Loder, brought suit against the above-named defendants, in this district, to recover damages to his retail drug business, which he claims to have suffered by reason of an agreement, contract, combination, and conspiracy into *1012which the defendants entered and carried into effect, in connection with other parties throughout the United States, in restraint of interstate trade and commerce, contrary to the provisions of Act Cong. July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 [Ú. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200], entitled “An act to protect trade and commerce against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
- Lowry v. Tile, Mantel & Grate Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1900
- Meyer v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Jayne v. LoderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Platt v. National Ass'n of Retail DruggistsIllinois Circuit Court · 1905