Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Richards
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 4, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
Samuel W. Richards brought an action in the court below against Meyer Bros, to recover, damages for a breach by them of a written contract, of which the following is a copy:
“Memorandum of agreement, made this 12th day of October, 1899, between Meyer Brothers, of Paterson, New Jersey, and Samuel W. Richards, of New York City, witnesseth: That said Meyer Brothers agree to employ said S. W. Richards as general manager of their department store in the city of Paterson, N. J., and said S. W. Richards accepts said employment, to begin October 12th, 1899, and to continue for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Laber v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Loder v. JayneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906