Legal Opinion

Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1964PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff utility companies object to the interrogatories of defendant electrical equipment manufacturers and thereby question the validity of the so-called passing-on doctrine in treble damage antitrust suits. Under that doctrine, a purchaser from one who has violated the-antitrust laws cannot recover an unlawful overcharge to the extent that the purchaser took into account his increased cost in setting the price to his own. customers.

These cases are among the large number of private actions that followed the-criminal and civil injunctive proceedings-brought by the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Alpine Pharmacy, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Cotler Drugs, Inc., and Louis Patlogan,formerly Doing Business as Patlogan's Western Pharmacy, Petitioner'-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API