Legal Opinion

J. B. Colt Co. v. Springle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYaesee, J.

The plaintiff’s exceptions contest the admissibility of evidence that plaintiff’s agent stated that the lighting plant would last “from ten to twenty-five years; that if same went bad company would make all necessary repairs; that generator was made of 5-16 galvanized steel; that thickness of generator was 12-16, and that plaintiff would-guarantee same (plant) for ten years.” This evidence was all admitted on the first issue.

Tbe contract, tbe execution of wbicb was admitted, contained tbe following provision:

“It being understood that tbis instrument, upon sucb acceptance, covers all of tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. McClamrockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. International Harvester Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Murray Co. v. . BroadwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Simpson v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laundry MacHinery Co. v. . SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. American Laundry Machinery Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Roberts-Atkinson Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Elizabeth City Hotel Corp. v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API