Legal Opinion

Elizabeth City Hotel Corp. v. Overman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

On his appeal to this Court, the defendant relies chiefly on his exceptions to the exclusion of evidence tending to show that oral representations were made to him as inducements for his execution of the stock subscription agreement, which is in writing, and to the instruction of the court to the jury that if they believed all the evidence and found the facts to be as the evidence tended to show, they should answer the issue, “$1,000, and interest”; and that, otherwise, they should answer the issue, “Nothing.” Neither of the assignments of error based on these exceptions can be sustained. It…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Pritchard v. . DaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Raleigh Improvement Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. J. B. Colt Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Smith v. Central Soya of Athens, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. Dorrity v. Greater Durham Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API