International Harvester Co. v. Carter

Clark:, C. J.

This is an action on certain notes for the balance due on an engine purchased by the defendant. The only defense involved is that of fraud alleged by defendant to have been practiced on him by plaintiff’s agent who sold defendant the engine, upon the written contract signed by the defendant set out in the record. This contract described the engine, with a stipulation against the order being countermanded and providing that no agent had the power’ to change the contract or warranty, and providing for notice to be given if the engine should fail to work well, and that a man should…