Legal Opinion · Dissent

Laundry MacHinery Co. v. . Skinner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1DissentStacy, C. J.

WINBORNE and DENNY, JJ., concur in dissenting opinion. The plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance of $549.98, and interest, alleged to be due on the purchase price of laundry machinery sold to the defendant under a written sales contract, accompanied by installment notes. The defendant denied the indebtedness, and by way of affirmative relief demanded $591.75 damages by reason of fraud alleged to have been practiced upon it in the sale — "false and fraudulent representations, warranties and guarantees" made by the agent of the plaintiff, which it is alleged induced the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. White Sewing MacHine Co. v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. W. B. Coppersmith & Sons, Inc. v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Clifford v. River Bend Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Myrtle Apartments, Inc. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Tradewinds Airlines, Inc. v. C-S Aviation ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Hall v. T. L. Kemp Jewelry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API