Duke v. Huntington
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. ' George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellant for his proportionate share as a stockholder of the indebtedness of a corporation, and he has°appealed therefrom. The court found, in accordance with certain allegations in the complaint, that on the first day of July, 1897, the corporation became indebted to the plaintiff’s assignor in a certain sum of money, being a balance due for certain work done by said assignor at the special instance of the corporation, and for which the corporation agreed to pay that sum on demand; that the capital stock of the corporation is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitehurst v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank v. De MoulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Maionchi v. NicholiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- United States National Bank v. StillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Shean v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.