Legal Opinion
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 2007No. A06-1849PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
James E. Gluba filed a workers’ compensation claim petition with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, alleging that he was permanently and totally disabled as a result of a work-related injury. A workers’ compensation judge found that Gluba had a permanent partial disability of 10 percent and was unemployed and unemployable as a result of the injury. The judge nonetheless concluded that Glu-ba was ineligible for permanent total disability benefits under Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 5(2)(c) (2006), which provides that a worker of Gluba’s age and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lyng v. CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Lora Walker v. Hartford Life and Accident InsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.