Legal Opinion

Lyng v. Castillo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1986No. 85-250PublishedCited by 218 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Eligibility and benefit levels in the federal food stamp program are determined on a “household” rather than an individual basis. The statutory definition of the term “household,” as amended in 1981 and 1982, generally treats parents, children, and siblings who live together as a single household, but does not treat more distant relatives, or groups of unrelated persons who live together, as a single household unless they also customarily purchase food and prepare meals together.1 Although there are variations in the facts of the four cases that were consolidated in the District Court, they…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by218 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lyng v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Davis v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API