Legal Opinion
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 2009No. A08-1042, A08-1148PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Relator challenges respondent commissioner’s refusal to set aside her disqualification from providing direct-contact services to persons served by licensed facilities. Relator argues that disqualifying her based on the involuntary termination of her parental rights and refusing to set aside the disqualification without considering evidence that she poses no risk of harm constitutes an abuse of discretion and violates the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Remedies Clauses of the Minnesota Constitution. We reverse on equal-protection grounds and remand for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McDonald v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- STUDOR, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Thompson v. Commissioner of HealthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.