Legal Opinion

Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 2003No. C0-02-1402PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant county challenges the district court’s determination that a vehicle it seized was not subject to statutory forfeiture and the awards of interest and attorney fees to respondent, the vehicle’s owner.

FACTS

On 9 March 2000, Erik Tharaldson contracted with respondent, Wolf Motor Co., Inc. (Wolf) to purchase a 2000 Ford F-350 pickup truck. Tharaldson paid for the truck with a personal check for $36,155.92 and took possession of the truck the next day. Wolfs sales manager later testified that the sale was contingent on Tharald-son’s obtaining financing to cover his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Marriage of Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Trapp v. HancuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. 2002 KIA 4 DOOR STL SEDANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Blackwell v. 2002 KIA 4 DOOR STL SEDANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API