Marriage of Katz v. Katz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court has jurisdiction to modify a child support order in a pre-1973 dissolution decree for a child between the ages of 18 and 21. Respondent Gail Katz became the custodial parent of Ronald Katz and Sheryl Katz following the divorce of the parties in 1972, when the age of majority was 21 years. She moved, in 1984, for an increase in child support payments for the two children, who were 20 and 17 years of age respectively at the time of the hearing. The trial court held that it had jurisdiction to increase child support…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Farnum v. Committee on Character & FitnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brugger v. BruggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. GherityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.