Legal Opinion

Chestnut v. Lodge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1966No. 39634, 39638 consPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solfisburg

Plaintiffs commenced actions in mandamus and for declaratory judgment in the circuit court of Sangamon County for the purpose of contesting their layoff as employees of the Department of Conservation of the State of Illinois. After a lengthy hearing the trial court ordered that the plaintiffs be restored to their positions and be granted back pay. The appellate court reversed on the ground that plaintiffs had no right to challenge the propriety of their layoff except by proceedings under the Administrative Review Act. (62 Ill. App. 2d 27.) We have granted leave to appeal.

Plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kusza v. MaximonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Kusza v. MAXIMONISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Fitzsimmons v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People ex rel. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. HulmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Chestnut v. LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Glen Misek and Richard J. Krakowski v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Harold Washington, Charles A. Pounian and Susan L. WeedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Mueller v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF ZURICHAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Quinlan & Tyson, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Bd. of Educ., Joliet Tp. v. Bd. of Educ.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API