Legal Opinion

Kusza v. Maximonis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1949PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Kusza and Adam Chonskie, policemen of the Borough of Shenandoah, claiming to have been illegally furloughed, instituted separate mandamus actions against William Maximonis, et al., Borough Councilmen, to compel their reinstatement and for back pay. Motions for judgments on the pleadings in favor of defendants were overruled and a peremptory writ of mandamus directed to issue in each case commanding reinstatement and payment of back salary. Defendants appealed in each case. The appeals were argued together and will be disposed of in one opinion.

The complaints averred, and the answers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Detoro v. PittstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Petrillo v. City of FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Whalen v. Massachusetts Trial CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API