Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kusza v. MAXIMONIS

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeals, 204 and 205PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

John Kusza and Adam Chonskie, policemen of the Borough of Shenandoah, claiming to have been illegally furloughed, instituted separate mandamus actions against William Maximonis, et al., Borough Councilmen, to compel their reinstatement and for back pay. Motions for judgments on the pleadings in favor of defendants were overruled and a peremptory writ of mandamus directed to issue in each case commanding reinstatement and payment of back salary. Defendants appealed in each case. The appeals were argued together and will be disposed of in one opinion.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Detoro v. PittstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Petrillo v. City of FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Whalen v. Massachusetts Trial CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API