Legal Opinion
Strand v. PLANNING BOARD OF SUDBURY
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 6, 1977PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiffs, pursuant to G. L. c. 41, § 81BB, filed a bill in equity in the Superior Court in which they appealed from a decision of the planning board of Sudbury (board) which approved a proposed subdivision. Because of procedural defects in the initial public hearing, the case was remanded to the board, which after a valid hearing (held on January 15, 1973) approved a plan subject to four conditions. A Superior Court judge modified the fourth condition of the board’s approval and, as modified, affirmed the decision of the board.
The plaintiffs, abutters and an owner adjacent to abutters…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Roberts-Haverhill v. City Coun. of HaverhillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Doliner v. Planning Board of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doeblin v. Tinkham Development Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Board of Selectmen v. Monument Inn, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Patelle v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Windsor v. PLANNING BOARD OF WAYLANDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.