Legal Opinion

Doeblin v. Tinkham Development Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 7, 1979PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

These actions pursuant to G. L. c. 41, § 81BB, arise from the following sequence of events. The defendant Tinkham Development Corporation (Tinkham), the owner of property in Northampton (locus), submitted a subdivision plan for the locus in January, 1974; that plan was approved upon a condition by the board of health but disapproved by the defendant planning board. In June, 1974, Tinkham submitted a revised subdivision plan amended in order to eliminate at least some of the planning board’s objections to the plan first submitted. The *721planning board approved the second plan upon conditions. No…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Weidman v. WeidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  4. Anderson v. DeVriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Loring Hills Developers Trust v. Planning Bd. of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Hodge v. KlugMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc. v. T. Wellington Carpets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Rosenfeld v. Board of Health of ChilmarkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API